Sunday, 21 June 2009

  • John Piper and Twitter

    (I took this from John Piper's website. Enjoy.)

    I see two kinds of response to social Internet media like blogging, MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, and others.

    One says: These media tend to shorten attention spans, weaken discursive reasoning, lure people away from Scripture and prayer, disembody relationships, feed the fires of narcissism, cater to the craving for attention, fill the world with drivel, shrink the soul’s capacity for greatness, and make us second-handers who comment on life when we ought to be living it. So boycott them and write books (not blogs) about the problem.

    The other response says: Yes, there is truth in all of that, but instead of boycotting, try to fill these media with as much provocative, reasonable, Bible-saturated, prayerful, relational, Christ-exalting, truth-driven, serious, creative pointers to true greatness as you can.

    Together with the team at Desiring God, I lean toward response #2. “Lean” is different from “leap.” We are aware that the medium tends to shape the message. This has been true, more or less, with every new medium that has come along—speech, drawing, handwriting, print, books, magazines, newspapers, tracts, 16mm home movies, flannel-graph, Cinerama, movies, Gospel Blimps, TV, radio, cassette tapes, 8-Tracks, blackboards, whiteboards, overhead projection, PowerPoint, skits, drama, banners, CDs, MP3s, sky-writing, video, texting, blogging, tweeting, Mina-Bird-training, etc.

    Dangers, dangers everywhere. Yes. But it seems to us that aggressive efforts to saturate a media with the supremacy of God, the truth of Scripture, the glory of Christ, the joy of the gospel, the insanity of sin, and the radical nature of Christian living is a good choice for some Christians. Not all. Everyone should abstain from some of these media. For example, we don’t have a television.

    That’s my general disposition toward media.

    Now what about Twitter? I find Twitter to be a kind of taunt: “Okay, truth-lover, see what you can do with 140 characters! You say your mission is to spread a passion for the supremacy of God in all things! Well, this is one of those ‘all things.’ Can you magnify Christ with this thimble-full of letters?”

    To which I respond:

    The sovereign Lord of the earth and sky
    Puts camels through a needle’s eye.
    And if his wisdom see it mete,
    He will put worlds inside a tweet.

    So I am not inclined to tweet that at 10AM the cat pulled the curtains down. But it might remind me that the Lion of Judah will roll up the heavens like a garment, and blow out the sun like a candle, because he just turned the light on. That tweet might distract someone from pornography and make them look up.

    I’ve been tweeting anonymously for a month mainly to test its spiritual and family effects on me. In spite of all the dangers, it seems like a risk worth taking. “All things were created through Christ and for Christ” (Colossians 1:16). The world does not know it, but that is why Twitter exists and that’s why I Tweet.

    What do you think?

Comments (13)

  • OhItWontBeForever
    amazing! it's good this way. FB and Twitter are here, now. there's really no use sitting and moaning about it, and even boycotting it, because that doesn't change the X number of others who are still FB-ing and tweeting... you might as well join 'em and do good, right? like JP said, it's just another medium! which is great. :) thanks for sharing!
  • scrambledmegzntoast@hardestlevel
    That John Piper must love Twitter because Tom@revelife retweets him all the time. I like twitter, but I tend to text all my thoughts to my friends instead of tweets. I could probably tweet and not send 4000 txt a month but what are you gonna do.
  • quest4god@revelife
    I am on Twitter for social networking with an eye to business exposure, but sharing the gospel/spiritual inspiration is a good idea.
  • Pensamientos@revelife
    While I see what you are saying in this message, I don't heartily agree. There is a time and place for everything. Sharing the word has a time and a place if you are on a networking place soley for that reason, it almost seems pointless to me, because it takes not only words to convince someone, but I am disgressing from my point.

    When I was in college we used a social networking site to keep in touch with family and friends for those times when it was simpler and less time consuming to write out on message than fifteen diferrent emails when we were already bogged down with work. It allowed for those of us to keep in touch who never had acess to a phone during the hours most would be awake. They were a way of keeping in touch with loved ones who were miles away. Now that I am older and have the time for a more personal message or phone call I only have a xanga for fun. But I urge you to consider that its a communication medium for many and not just another form of media. I do not watch tv or movies, really the only media I keep up with is the news. Social sites are not only media, there are plenty on there using it for what seems secular, but is in truth only trying to keep loved ones from feeling left out of their busy lives!
  • TheGreatBout

    @Pensamientos@revelife - These are not my words. This is written by John Piper. Thanks for commenting!

  • thepurpleporpoise
    I can see what Mr. Piper is saying here and in general I like his thoughts. I am inclined to disagree with his implication though. Toward the end he implied that if someone is posting silly stories/ details about their life that they are somehow not honoring G-D with it unless they expressly say something about G-D. Sometimes posting seemingly trivial things allows community to respond and act. For example, I tweeted that I hate it when people treat me like I'm an idiot this morning...to which many of my believing friends either responded that they prayed that my day would go better, or they went so far to call me out on pride, that makes me think people are treating me like an idiot. I was made better by community in a matter of minutes because of a seemingly silly, trivial tweet!
  • Lynnjynh9315
    And then we have response no. 3 which says that "life tanks and we really need social networking sites to make life seem like it doesn't completely collapse under a massive heap of dinkyness composed of 10,000 tons of death and screaming. Why live life when Xanga is so much better?"

    I'm trying to shift away from that perspective.... :)
  • heidi_helen

    Very interesting. Actually I think I spend way too much time blogging and facebooking. I agree it really can be destructive. Of course such sites can also be used for good. I wonder what John Piper will find out in his little experiement - like if he really can become addicted to it.


    -Heidi

  • TheGreatBout

    @heidi_helen - He tweets several times a day, it's always about scripture.

  • FreeeVerse
    Interesting post :)
  • heidi_helen

    @heidi_helen - he says he is interested in the family effects. What about his children/teens using it?

  • heidi_helen

    Oops I meant to reply to you not myself, LOL.

  • TheGreatBout

    @heidi_helen - Not sure. Guess he'll find out how this activity affects his family at some point.

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

Who recommended?